DevOps for Web Development: DEVOPS Concepts


DevOps is not a tool or technology; it is an approach or culture that makes things better. This chapter describes in detail how DevOps solves different problems of the traditional application—delivery cycle. It also describes how it can be used to make development and operations teams efficient and effective in order to make time to market faster by improving culture. It also explains key concepts essential for evolving DevOps culture. You will learn about the DevOps culture, its lifecycle and key concepts, and tools, technologies, and platforms used for automating different aspects of application lifecycle management.

In this chapter, we will cover the following topics: Understanding the DevOps movement The DevOps lifecycle—it’s all about “continuous” Continuous integration Configuration management Continuous delivery/continuous deployment Continuous monitoring

DevOps Continuous Approach

Understanding the DevOps movement

Let’s try to understand what DevOps is. Is it a real, technical word? No, because DevOps is not just about technical stuff. It is also neither simply a technology nor an innovation. In simple terms, DevOps is a blend of complex terminologies. It can be considered as a concept, culture, development and operational philosophy, or a movement.

To understand DevOps, let’s revisit the old days of any IT organization. Consider there are multiple environments where an application is deployed. The following sequence of events takes place when any new feature is implemented or bug fixed:

  1. The development team writes code to implement a new feature or fix a bug. This new code is deployed to the development environment and generally tested by the development team.
  2. The new code is deployed to the QA environment, where it is verified by the testing team.
  3. The code is then provided to the operations team for deploying it to the production environment.
  4. The operations team is responsible for managing and maintaining the code.

Let’s list the possible issues in this approach:

  • The transition of the current application build from the development environment to the production environment takes weeks or months.
  • The priorities of the development team, QA team, and IT operations team are different in an organization and effective, and efficient co-ordination becomes a necessity for smooth operations.
  • The development team is focused on the latest development release, while the operations team cares about the stability of the production environment.
  • The development and operations teams are not aware of each other’s work and work culture.
  • Both teams work in different types of environments; there is a possibility that the development team has resource constraints and they therefore use a different kind of configuration. It may work on the localhost or in the dev environment.
  • The operations team works on production resources and there will therefore be a huge gap in the configuration and deployment environments. It may not work where it needs to run—the production environment.
  • Assumptions are key in such a scenario, and it is improbable that both teams will work under the same set of assumptions.
  • There is manual work involved in setting up the runtime environment and configuration and deployment activities. The biggest issue with the manual application-deployment process is its nonrepeatability and error-prone nature.
  • The development team has the executable files, configuration files, database scripts, and deployment documentation. They provide it to the operations team. All these artifacts are verified on the development environment and not in production or staging.
  • Each team may take a different approach for setting up the runtime environment and the configuration and deployment activities, considering resource constraints and resource availability.
  • In addition, the deployment process needs to be documented for future usage. Now, maintaining the documentation is a time-consuming task that requires collaboration between different stakeholders.
  • Both teams work separately and hence there can be a situation where both use different automation techniques.
  • Both teams are unaware of the challenges faced by each other and hence may not be able to visualize or understand an ideal scenario in which the application works.
  • While the operations team is busy in deployment activities, the development team may get another request for a feature implementation or bug fix; in such a case, if the operations team faces any issues in deployment, they may try to consult the development team, who are already occupied with the new implementation request. This results in communication gaps, and the required collaboration may not happen.
  • There is hardly any collaboration between the development team and the operations team. Poor collaboration causes many issues in the application’s deployment to different environments, resulting in back-and-forth communication through e-mail, chat, calls, meetings, and so on, and it often ends in quick fixes.
  • Challenges for the development team:
    • The competitive market creates pressure of on-time delivery.
    • They have to take care of production-ready code management and new feature implementation.
    • The release cycle is often long and hence the development team has to make assumptions before the application deployment finally takes place. In such a scenario, it takes more time to fix the issues that occurred during deployment in the staging or production environment.
  • Challenges for the operations team:
    • Resource contention: It’s difficult to handle increasing resource demands
    • Redesigning or tweaking: This is needed to run the application in the production environment
    • Diagnosing and rectifying: They are supposed to diagnose and rectify issues after application deployment in isolation

Collaboration among different stakeholders brings many business and technical benefits that help organizations achieve their business goals.

Continuous Integration(CI),Continuous Testing(CT), and Continuous Delivery(CD) are significant part of DevOps culture. CI includes automating builds, unit tests, and packaging processes while CD is concerned with the application delivery pipeline across different environments. CI and CD accelerate the application development process through automation across different phases, such as build, test, and code analysis, and enable users achieve end-to-end automation in the application delivery lifecycle.

Continuous integration and continuous delivery or deployment are well supported by cloud provisioning and configuration management. Continuous monitoring helps identify issues or bottlenecks in the end-to-end pipeline and helps make the pipeline effective.

Continuous feedback is an integral part of this pipeline, which directs the stakeholders whether are close to the required outcome or going in the different direction.

For more details get the DevOps for Web Development book.

DevOps for Web Devlopment

It is also available at:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s